Skip to content
Oddiblogg
  • About the blog
    • The blog and AI
  • Contact me
  • Help
    • Privacy Policy
  • English
    • Norwegian Bokmål
    • Russian
    • Ukrainian
  • Search Icon

Oddiblogg

The West’s sanctions against Russia should have come sooner

The West’s sanctions against Russia should have come sooner

28. May 2022 Oddi Comments 1 comment

Dette innlegget er også tilgjengelig i: Norsk bokmål Русский Українська

After 24 February, the EU, the US and a number of other countries have imposed heavy sanctions on the Russian economy. Sanctions that until now seem to have little effect. When Russia took Chechnya in 1999, Russia should receive reactions. After Russia’s attack on South Ossetia (Georgia) in 2008, something had to be done. The sanctions we have now, we should get in 2014.

Old post

This post is over 1 year old. The content might therefore be less relevant now.

Sanctions after 2014

In 2014, a number of sanctions against Russia will be introduced. Annexation of another country’s territories was unacceptable. Crimea was annexed, which in reality also became areas of the Donbas. The war in Ukraine that we say started on February 24, 2022, actually started in the spring of 2014.

The sanctions that were introduced at the time are mostly aimed at private individuals. It is against wealth and travel in western countries. Generals in the Russian army are among those affected by sanctions. The problem is that they had little or no wealth abroad. Nor did travel to western countries covered by the sanctions be something they did often. Other things that were affected by the sanctions were the sale of technology, especially technology that can be used militarily.

EU made dependent on Russian oil and gas

As early as 2014, parts of Europe were dependent on Russian gas. After 2014, this dependence has been made even greater. The EU is now working to become independent of Russian energy as soon as possible. The United States was among those who warned of the danger of Russian gas. Several countries were blind to the danger that energy could be used in a conflict.

In my opinion, Russia’s exports of gas to Germany, Italy and other EU countries made Putin dare to attack Ukraine. Putin knows that the West’s dependence on Russian energy will make the possibility of sanctions small. Many argued that energy imports were independent of policy and had to be seen as purely commercial. In particular, the construction of a new gas pipeline (Nord Stream 2) between Russia and Germany created debate. The United States warned Germany that the pipeline could make Germany vulnerable in a conflict. Today, the pipeline is complete, but will probably never be used. Now Germany and others are looking for other ways to get the gas.

The West’s purchase of Russian energy has also meant that Russia has earned billions. Money they have used to build up their arsenal. Weapons used in an attempt to stop that democracy in Ukraine.

Why 2014?

Maidan Square in Kyiv in the winter of 2013-14

As I consider it now and have always considered it, the sanctions against Russia after 2014 were small and far too cautious.

By introducing a ban on imports of Russian energy, energy will not be able to be used as a means of pressure from Russia against the EU. Western countries would not have “buttered the Russian economy” either. This would mean that Russia would have to sell its energy elsewhere, where the willingness to pay a high price is less. We see today that Russia is trying to sell oil to countries in Africa at far below market price. The Russian economy would not be capable of the gigantic build-up of the military we have seen in recent years.

After February 24, Russia was excluded from the Swift system that deals with transfers of money internationally. But because Western countries depend on paying for their energy, some large Russian banks were not sanctioned. By introducing the sanctions we have today, we would now have an opportunity for a full blockade of the Swift system against Russia.

The war may have been avoided by sanctions

The war we see in Ukraine today might have been avoided by stronger reactions from the West in 2014. The Russian economy would be weaker and the opportunity to build up the defense less. Western countries would also become less vulnerable to Russian countermeasures.

These days, we are experiencing an almost full sporting and cultural boycott of Russia. This is perhaps the form of reaction that works best. I called for such measures after 2014. The reason I think they are important is that it becomes obvious to the people of Russia that they stand for something unacceptable. Not being able to see their sports heroes compete affects far more than generals not being allowed to travel to Spain.

The result of hesitating with sanctions is one hundred thousand dead. Thousands injured for the rest of their lives, traumatized people. Raped women and young girls. Cities became rock piles. The price of hesitation has been high. The hope with all the suffering is that democracy wins over the dictatorship. The war in Ukraine started in 2014, not February 24.

Sources:

Nord Stream – Wikipedia

Sanctions in response to Russia ‘s military aggression against Ukraine – guide for business – regjeringen.no

EU presents full list of Russia sanctions – E24 (From 2014)

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


War Russia - Ukraine
Russia, war

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Boris Bondarev a Russian with courage
NEXT
100 days since the attack on Ukraine

1 thought on “The West’s sanctions against Russia should have come sooner”

  1. Per Mortensen says:
    28. May 2022 at 19:14

    Jeg er temmelig sikker på at det ikke hadde blitt noen krig dersom sanksjoner og at EU ikke kjøpte gass fra Russland tidligere. Stor sannsynlighet for at det ville knekt Russisk økonomi og at Putin var fernet.

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Follow the blog

  • facebook
  • Telegram
  • Bluesky

Latest posts

  • Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize
    8. July 2025
  • The supporters of Russia’s war in Ukraine
    6. July 2025
  • Ideological war against Iran
    22. June 2025
  • Harvey Milk, who was it?
    18. June 2025
  • What does the war between Israel and Iran mean for Ukraine?
    15. June 2025
  • Introduces entry sanctions against Israel
    10. June 2025
  • Hunger as a weapon in Gaza
    27. May 2025
  • Zero Russian commitment to peace negotiations
    24. May 2025
  • Amnesty unwanted in Russia
    19. May 2025
  • Caricature, an apt drawing
    10. May 2025

Categories

  • Gaza War
  • History
  • Norway
  • War Russia – Ukraine
  • World

Tags

Afghanistan Alexander Lukashenko Alexei Navalny Belarus China Crimea Denmark Donald Trump EU Finland Gaza Genocide Georgia Germany Great Britain Hamas human rights Iran Israel Joe Biden Josef Stalin Kamala Harris Kyiv Military coup Myanmar NATO Netherlands Norway Palestine Poland racism Russia Soviet Union sport Svetlana Tikhanovskaja Sweden Taliban Ukraine USA USA election 2024 Vladimir Putin Volodymyr Zelenskyj war War crime WW2
© 2025   Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Odd Kristiansen
%d